VA LOGO

Logo for the Journal of Rehab R and D
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Vol. 38 No. 4, July/August 2001

Cineplasty as a control input for externally powered prosthetic components

Richard F. ff. Weir, PhD; Craig W. Heckathorne, MS; Dudley S. Childress, PhD

VA Chicago Health Care System-Lakeside Division, Chicago, Illinois; Northwestern University Prosthetics Research Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois


This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Washington DC.

This paper was originally published in German in the peer reviewed journal Medizinisch Orthopädische Technik, pp 9-12, 1/2001 issue. Permission has been given by the publishers to publish the paper in English in the Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Richard F. ff. Weir, PhD, Northwestern University, Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center and Prosthetic Research Laboratory, 345 E. Superior, RM1441, Chicago, Illinois 60611; email: rweir@northwestern.edu.

Abstract — To achieve significant improvement in the function of electric-powered, upper-limb prostheses, we believe it is necessary to develop better control interfaces with inherent sensory feedback. Small cineplasties, or other surgical procedures that also externalize the force and excursion of a muscle, could potentially provide this superior control. Connecting a muscle to a prosthetic component via a controller that embodies the concept of extended physiological proprioception (EPP) would enable the physiological sensory feedback inherent in the skin, muscle, and other tissues of the cineplasty to inform the user of the state of the prosthesis. Multiple miniature forearm tunnel cineplasties, each with an EPP controller, might enable meaningful independent multifinger control of hand prostheses. At higher levels of amputation (e.g., transhumeral), small pectoral or deltoid cineplasties could augment existing control sources to improve control of multifunctional total arm prostheses. To explore the feasibility of these ideas, we quantified the control capabilities of individuals with pre-existing biceps muscle tunnel cineplasties with the use of pursuit tracking experiments. A "proof-of-concept" EPP electric hand prosthesis was also successfully developed for a subject with agonist-antagonist, forearm tendon exteriorization cineplasties. The results of the tracking studies demonstrate numerically the efficacy of control by cineplastized muscles relative to other control approaches.

Key words: cineplasty, EPP, extended physiological proprioception, kineplasty, muscle properties, prosthesis, pursuit tracking, transinformation, upper extremity.

INTRODUCTION

  The control of present day, externally powered prostheses is generally limited to sequential control of multiple joints for arm prostheses and to a single degree-of-freedom (opening-closing) of the hand replacement. Coordinated control of multifunctional prostheses requires more integrated control than is possible with myoelectricity. Although myoelectric control has been successful in many transradial fittings, this approach provides essentially no feedback to the user concerning the mechanical state of the hand components being controlled and has been used mainly in a velocity-control mode. We believe it is necessary to develop control interfaces with inherent sensory feedback if a significant improvement in the function of electric-powered, upper-limb prostheses is to be achieved.

  We believe such interfaces can be achieved with additional surgical procedures in conjunction with physiologically appropriate, externally powered prosthesis controllers. Surgical procedures, such as the Vanghetti-Sauerbruch-Lebsche muscle tunnel cineplasty, or other surgical procedures, such as the tendon exteriorization cineplasty by Beasley (1), which externalize the force and excursion of a muscle or tendon, can provide this appropriate control. The Vanghetti-Sauerbruch-Lebsche muscle tunnel cineplasty is an evolution of the tendon "loops" and "clubs" originally advocated by Vanghetti (2-4), the muscle tunnel cineplasties advocated by Sauerbruch (5,6), and their later modification during World War II by Lebsche (7). The surgical procedure to create a Vanghetti-Sauerbruch-Lebsche muscle tunnel cineplasty was most recently described by Brückner (8).

  Brückner and Thomas (9) have presented their experiences with the functional value of the Sauerbruch-Lebsche procedure. Brückner's group, based in the former DDR (East Germany), created a total of 20 tunnels in 16 patients over a period of 6 years starting in 1988. The surgeons considered all but one of these tunnels to have been successful. They commented that the functional outcome (use of the prosthesis) was, however, dependent on the motivation and mental well-being of the patients. This was a finding that was deemed critical to the success of the procedure by others (10,11).

  With the exception of Brückner and Beasley, few surgeons since Sauerbruch and Lebsche have systematically examined new ways to bring muscular forces outside the body. Surgical techniques have advanced enormously over the last 50 years and we believe that direct or "almost-direct" connections that are simple, effective, and pleasing in appearance are possible if surgeons, engineers, prosthetists, and others work together collaboratively on this control problem.

  The creation of control interfaces will require surgical revisions beyond the initial amputation surgery. Preservation of residual muscle tone, length, and excursion will be of paramount importance if future revisions are to be successful at creating novel physical, muscle-prosthesis interfaces. Myoplasty and/or myodesis might be performed at the time of initial amputation surgery to retain the ability of residual musculature to easily develop tension and reduce associated muscle atrophy. In myoplasty, agonist-antagonist residual muscle pairs are tied off against each other. In myodesis, the residual muscle is stitched to the bone. Myoplasty could be performed on the superficial residual muscles while myodesis could be used on the deep residual muscles.

  Attaching the externalized muscle to a prosthetic component through a controller that embodies the concept of extended physiological proprioception (EPP) (12) allows the position, speed, and force of the controlling muscle to be directly correlated (in a one-to-one manner) to the position, speed, and force of the prosthetic component. The physiological sensory feedback inherent in the skin and muscle of the cineplasty informs the user of the state of the prosthesis in a somewhat subconscious and natural manner. Using the cineplastized muscle as a control input to an EPP controller provides a method of physically linking a skeletal muscle to an externally powered device.

  In the case of an electrically powered prosthetic device, the cineplasty is only required to produce a control signal; the power needed to drive the prosthesis itself comes from the batteries. In addition, the controller is flexible enough to be adjusted to accept, as its control input, the range of force and excursion available from the amputee's cineplastized muscle. In essence, this idea of EPP control of a prosthesis can be compared to power steering for a car. This means that even small muscles of the forearm or hand could be used effectively for prosthesis control.

  For persons with long transradial amputations or wrist disarticulations, we envision multiple miniature tunnel cineplasties or exteriorized tendons, each with an EPP controller, providing coordinated, subconscious, independent multifinger control of a hand prosthesis. At higher levels, such as the short transhumeral or shoulder disarticulation level, small pectoral or deltoid tunnel cineplasties could augment existing control sources to improve control of multifunctional, total arm prostheses. We are currently involved in the development of a new microprocessor-based EPP controller (13,14) for use in this application.

  The idea of using a muscle tunnel cineplasty to control an externally powered prosthesis is not new; reference is made to the idea in Spittler and Rosen (15) and in Kessler (16). In the discussion section of Spittler and Rosen's paper, Spittler mentions being approached by members of the IBM team about the possibility of using cineplasties to actuate switches to control an electric arm. IBM had been contracted by the Committee on Artificial Limbs to develop the first electric arm prosthesis in the United States. The idea is also suggested for investigation in Alldredge et al. (17).

  More recently, Filatov and Voinova (18,19) reported on modifications to the cineplastic technique and the development of original operations for fastening and controlling externally powered prostheses. Their physiological studies led them to conclude that tunnel cineplasties were a reliable source of control. In the United States, Leal and Malone (20) reviewed an arm prosthesis they made using a Veterans Affairs/United States Manufacturing Corporation (VA/USMC) electric hand that was controlled by a transradial amputee with a biceps cineplasty.

  In the fitting of high-level, upper-limb amputees, the current trend is to use hybrid systems that incorporate both body-powered and externally powered components. With the use of the superior features from each technology, the number of available control sites can be used to best effect. Pectoral or other tunnel cineplasties offer a means of creating greatly needed control sites at these higher levels of amputation. Marquardt (21) described a unilateral forequarter amputee who controlled an electromechanical hand and wrist rotator with a pectoral cineplasty in conjunction with sequential switch control. Lucke, Marquardt, and Carstens (22) discussed the indications for the use of a pectoral cineplasty for amputations in the region of the shoulder girdle, and described how four functions could be obtained from one muscle using a four-stage switch. Murphy (23) mentioned the idea of miniature tunnel cineplasties for the control of externally powered devices as a possibility. Childress (24) first proposed the use of miniature tunnel cineplasties in conjunction with EPP control.

  Toward this goal of achieving independent, multifunctional control of upper-limb prostheses, we have performed studies to quantify the control capabilities of persons with pre-existing cineplasties. In addition, we have developed and fitted a "proof-of-concept" EPP electric hand prosthesis that was controlled using preexisting exteriorized forearm tendon cineplastics.

METHODS

Quantification of Control Capabilities of Persons with Pre-existing Biceps Cineplasties
  Quantification of cineplasty performance was measured with the use of pursuit tracking experiments. We also recorded the mechanical properties for the muscle tunnel cineplasty of each subject by measuring the length and tension characteristics of the cineplastized muscle. The tracking abilities of three persons with biceps cineplasties were examined (25). Their cineplastic tracking ability was compared with their ability to track through biscapular abduction with the use of the harness and Bowden cables commonly used in body-powered prostheses (figure-of-nine harness). The subjects' tracking capabilities using their intact contra-lateral elbow was also measured.

  In pursuit tracking tasks, a band-limited, Gaussian distributed, randomly moving "target" was displayed on a screen (the oscilloscope in Figure 1). The subject tried to maintain a "follower," which was under his control (the cineplasty in inset of Figure 1), superimposed on this moving target. Both target and follower paths were recorded and then compared during postprocessing. By modeling the human operator as an information channel with additive noise, we derived a measure (the transinformation rate) of how well the follower matched the target. This process was repeated for a number of target signals of differing bandwidth. The experimental procedure was similar to that used by Doubler and Childress (26) and can be found in Weir (25). See Results section.


A photograph showing the experimental setup used to quantify biceps muscle tunnel cineplasty control capabilities
Figure 1. Experimental setup used to quantify biceps muscle tunnel cineplasty control capabilities. The inset shows how the muscle tunnel cineplasty was interfaced to the apparatus.

  The mechanical properties for cineplastized muscle of each subject were also obtained. These measurements were taken from isometric length-tension, isotonic load-excursion, and force-velocity relationships found for the cineplastized muscle of each subject (25). These relationships give an indication of the condition of the cineplastized muscle and are valuable for prosthesis design because they provide an idea of the range of forces, excursions, and velocities available for control inputs. The mechanical properties for each subject's cineplastized muscle are summarized in Table 1.


Table 1.
The mechanical properties for each subject's biceps muscle tunnel cineplasty.

Subject Maximum isometric tension (N) Maximum speed of shortening (m/s) Excursion of tunnel (mm)

1 163 0.37 47
2 129 0.58 50
3 127 0.54 53

Development of an EPP Prosthesis with Direct Muscle Attachment
  In anticipation of favorable quantification results and the potential advantages of direct muscle attachment, we developed, and subsequently fitted, a "proof-of-concept" prosthesis (27,28). An Otto Bock System Electric Hand (Otto Bock Healthcare, Duderstadt, Germany) was used. This hand was modified to incorporate a cable-actuated electronic EPP controller. These modifications take advantage of the inherent sensory apparatus of the tendons and muscles, as well as that of the skin lining the tendons. The prosthesis is controlled by pulling on cables that mechanically link the tendon loops to a force transducer mounted to the thumb in the hand (Figures 2 and 3). An electronic controller converts the force on the sensor into a drive signal for the hand mechanism. The position and speed of movement of the tendon (and the muscle) directly control the position and speed of movement of the fingers and thumb of the electric hand. Movement of the flexor tendon causes the hand to close a distance proportional to the shortening of the muscle. Movement of the extensor tendon causes the hand to open a distance proportional to the shortening of that muscle.


A schematic showing the modified Otto Bock Hand
Figure 2. Schematic of the modified Otto Bock Hand and how it could be interfaced for direct muscle attachment. This is an example of an "unbeatable" position servomechanism.

  An experimental fitting (Figure 3) of this hand was performed on a subject with a transcarpal amputation of the right hand, for whom forearm tendon exteriorization cineplasties (1) had been performed (by Robert Beasley) 19 years before this study. The exteriorized tendons appear as skin-lined loops (Figure 3a), one on the ventral surface (flexor muscles) and one on the dorsal surface (extensor muscles) of the forearm. When the muscles associated with the tendons are contracted, the loops move a short distance proximally (toward the elbow). Each loop can be controlled independently of the other or both loops can be controlled simultaneously.


A photograph of the subject's exteriorized tendon cineplasty showing a pen passing through the skin-lined tendon loop  (a)

A photograph of the prototype version of the proof-of-concept prosthesis  (b)

A photograph of the finished proof-of-concept prosthesis  (c)

Figures 3a-c. (a) Picture of the subject's exteriorized tendon cineplasty showing a pen passing through the skin-lined tendon loop, (b) picture of a prototype version of the "proof-of-concept" prosthesis, and (c) picture of the finished "proof-of-concept" prosthesis.

  Although the subject had not used the tendons for prosthetic control for a number of years, he was able to demonstrate fair to good control of the prosthesis. The device was adjusted to operate with 6 mm of tendon excursion and with an actuation force of 225-500 g.

RESULTS

Quantification of Control Capabilities of Persons with Pre-existing Biceps Cineplasties
  Average results for pursuit tracking data obtained for three persons with biceps tunnel cineplasties are shown in Figure 4. The transinformation rate is a measure of tracking performance that varies with the bandwidth of the signal tracked. Essentially, the higher the transinformation rate, the better the tracking performance. The graph shows that tracking using the contralateral intact elbow is superior to tracking using either a tunnel cineplasty or a conventional figure-of-nine harness. However, the differences shown between the tracking performance with a cineplasty and an figure-of-nine harness are not statistically significant. The variability of the control using the figure-of-nine harness is far greater than that associated with the tunnel cineplasty. This suggests that the control with the cineplasty is more consistent than that associated with a figure-of-nine harness.


A graph showing the mean transinformation rate versus bandwidth
Figure 4. Graph of mean transinformation rate versus bandwidth, for three subjects performing pursuit tracking experiments. It compares control using their cineplasty versus a figure-of-nine control harness versus their intact contralateral elbow.

  We believe this result to be encouraging. It indicates that because control by tunnel cineplasty is on a par with current body-powered positioning methods, it is superior to velocity-control techniques: the techniques currently favored for commercially available myoelectrically controlled prostheses. Previous work (26) has shown the superiority of position control over velocity control in tracking tasks. Both tunnel cineplasty prosthesis control and cable-actuated prosthesis control are examples of position control.

  The only other study to look at control using a cineplasty as opposed to a conventional harness was conducted by Mount and Bernberg (29) who found that control using a cineplasty was superior at discriminating the shape of different objects grasped. The authors commented that this result could have been in part because of the practice of using voluntary closing terminal devices (Army Prosthetics Research Laboratory [APRL] hook and hand) with cineplasty prostheses as opposed to using voluntary-opening devices with harness-controlled prostheses of the day.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

  A large body of data was obtained that characterizes human performance with the use of muscle tunnel cineplasties. The results show numerically the efficacy of control by cineplastized muscles relative to other control approaches. It was important to collect the human factors data on cineplasties at this time because the number of subjects available for such tests is declining rapidly in the United States. World War II veterans who had cineplasty procedures are generally in their seventies and the numbers of cineplasties done after the Korean and Vietnam wars were relatively small in number. Cineplasty procedures essentially ended in the United States about 1974 with the retirement of those surgeons who were the main proponents of the procedure and the rise of myoelectric control.

  The first clinical fitting (to our knowledge) of a powered hand prosthesis, controlled directly by antagonist muscles (via exteriorized tendons) in a physiological manner, was accomplished. An electronic, EPP controller was developed and incorporated with an Otto Bock adult electric hand. This was a new approach to control of upper-limb prostheses. Advantages of direct muscle attachment used in conjunction with EPP controllers are that it provides:

  We are currently exploring individual control of powered fingers and supplemental control at shoulder disarticulation prostheses through direct muscle interfaces. In addition, we are involved in trying to stimulate new ideas in surgery so that interface methods between muscles and prostheses might be improved.

  Preservation of muscle tone, length, and excursion are of paramount importance if future surgery is to be successful at creating novel physical muscle-prosthesis interfaces. Myoplasty and/or myodesis procedures are probably important to ensure the ability to develop tension when voluntarily contracted. This would serve to preserve muscle tone and reduce muscle atrophy.

REFERENCES
  1. Beasley RW. The tendon exteriorization cineplasty, a preliminary report. Inter-clinic Information Bulletin. Committee on Prosthetics Research and Development 1966;5(8):6-8.
  2. Vanghetti G. Plastica dei Monconi a Scopo di Protesi Cinematica. [Plastic surgery after the fashion of Monconi for the purpose of cinematic prostheses (Cineplasty surgery for prosthesis control)] Arch Ortop 1899;16(5):305-24.
  3. Vanghetti G. Plastica dei Monconi a Scopo di Protesi Cinematica. [Plastic surgery after the fashion of Monconi for the purpose of cinematic prostheses (Cineplasty surgery for prosthesis control)] Arch Ortop 1899;16(6):385-410.
  4. Vanghetti G. Plastica dei Monconi ed Amputazioni Transitore. [Plastic surgery after the fashion of Monconi and provisional amputation] Arch Ortop 1900;17(5-6):305-29.
  5. Sauerbruch F. Chirurgische Vorarbiet für eine Willkürlich Bewegliche Künstliche Hand. [Preparatory surgery for a voluntary controlled artificial hand]. Med Klinik 1915;11(41):1125-6.
  6. Sauerbruch F. Die Willkürlich Bewegbare Künstliche Hand. Eine Anleitung für Chirurgen und Techniker. [The voluntary controlled artificial hand. A guide for surgeons and technicians]. 1st ed. Berlin: Julius Springer-Verlag; 1916.
  7. Lebsche M. Ohnhänder. Aus dem Caritasspital Schloss Fürstenried. [Unilateral amputee. From the Charity Hospital Castle Fürstenried]. Langenbeck's Archiv Deutsche Z Chir;265:292-5.
  8. Brückner L. Sauerbruch-Lebsche-Vanghetti cineplasty: the surgical procedure. In: Orthopaedics and Traumatology, volume 1, no. 2. Munich: Urban and Vogel; 1992. p. 90-9.
  9. Brückner L, Thomas M. Der funktionelle Wert des Sauerbruch-Armes [The functional value of the Sauerbruch arm]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1994;132(3):185-92.
  10. Brav EA, Spittler AW, Luscombe HB, Kuitert JH, MacDonald WF, Vultee FE, et al. Cineplasty--An end result study. J Bone Joint Surg 1964;39-A(1):59-76.
  11. Brav EA, MacDonald WF, Woodard GH, Leonard F. Cineplasty--Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg 1964;46-A(5):1137-8.
  12. Simpson DC. The choice of control system for the multimovement prosthesis: extended physiological proprioception (EPP). In: The control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses. Herberts P, Kadefors R, Magnusson R, Petersen I, editors. Springfield, Illinois: Charles Thomas; 1974.
  13. Al-Angari HM. A design of a two degree-of-freedom microprocessor-based EPP position controller for upper-limb prostheses. [Master of Science thesis]. Evanston (IL): Northwestern Univ.; 2001.
  14. Bertos YA, Heckathorne CW, Weir RF ff, Childress DS. A microprocessor-based EPP controller for electric-powered prostheses. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO); 1998 June 28-July 3; Amsterdam, Netherlands. Copenhagen (Denmark): ISPO Publications; 1998. p. 339-41.
  15. Spittler AW, Rosen IE. Cineplastic muscle motors for prostheses of arm amputees. J Bone Joint Surg 1951;33-A:601-12.
  16. Kessler HH. Cineplasty. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas; 1947.
  17. Alldredge RH, Inman VT, Jampol H, Murphy EF, Spittler AW. The techniques of cineplasty. In: Klopsteg PE, Wilson PD, editors. Human limbs and their substitutes. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1954. p. 48-78.
  18. Filatov VI, Voinova LE. Kineplasticheskie operatsii v sisteme reabilitatsii invalidov posle amputatsii verkhnikh konechnostei. [Kineplasty in rehabilitation of invalids after upper extremity amputations]. Ortop Travmatol Protez 1978;11:15-9.
  19. Filatov VI, Voinova LE. Kineplastik nach der Amputation der oberen Extremitaten. [Kineplastic reconstruction after upper limb amputation (author's translation)]. Int J Rehabil Res 1981;4(3):325-34.
  20. Leal JM, Malone JM. VA/USMC electric hand with below elbow cineplasty. Bull Prosthet Res 1981;10(35):52-6.
  21. Marquardt E. Come-back of the pectoral cineplasty. J Assoc Child Prosthet Orthot Clin 1987:22(2):32.
  22. Lucke R, Marquardt E, Carstens C. Kineplasty according to Sauerbruch--The fresh indication for the pectoralis canal in amputations in the region of the shoulder girdle. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics; 1989 Nov 12-17; Kobe, Japan. Copenhagen (Denmark): ISPO Publications; 1989. p. 200.
  23. Murphy EF. Multidimensional correlation of muscle properties. Unpublished paper.
  24. Childress, DS. Control philosophies for limb prostheses. In: Paul JP, Barbenel JC, Courtney JM, Kenedi RM, editors. Progress in bioengineering. Proceedings of an international seminar held on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Strathclyde Bioengineering Unit; 1988 Sep; Glasgow, Scotland. New York: Adam Hilger; 1989. p. 210-5.
  25. Weir RF ff. Direct muscle attachment as a control input for a position servo-prosthesis controller [PhD dissertation]. Evanston (IL): Northwestern Univ.; 1995.
  26. Doubler JA, Childress DS. An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a control technique. J Rehabil Res Dev 1984;21(1):5-18.
  27. Childress D, Grahn E, Weir R, Heckathorne C, Uellendahl J. Modification of a Bock electric hand for EPP control by exteriorized tendons. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP); 1993 Mar 30-Apr 3; Las Vegas, NV. Alexandria (VT): AAOP; 1993. p. 13.
  28. Heckathorne CW, Childress DS, Grahn EC, Strysik J, Uellendahl J. EPP control of an electric hand by exteriorized forearm tendons. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO); 1995 Apr 2-7; Melbourne, Australia. Copenhagen (Denmark): ISPO Publications; 1995. p. 101.
  29. Mount GE, Bernberg RE. A preliminary comparison of perception under cineplastic and harness prostheses. Am J Psych 1949;62:106-10.

Go to TOP.


View Contents

  Last Updated Tuesday, December 2, 2008 9:16 AM

Last revised Tue 8/14/2001; comments, problems, etc., to WM.