JRRD Logo


Volume 44 Number 3 2007
Pages 407 — 416


Abstract - Human temporal bones versus mechanical model to evaluate three middle ear transducers

Christof Stieger, MSc;1* Hans Bernhard, MSc;2 Daniela Waeckerlin, BSc;3 Martin Kompis, MD, PhD;1 Juergen Burger, PhD;3 Rudolf Haeusler, MD1

1Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 2Helbling Technik Bern AG , Liebefeld, Switzerland; 3Department of Microtechnology, Berner Fachhochschule, Biel, Switzerland

Abstract — A life-size mechanical middle ear model and human temporal bones were used to evaluate three different middle ear transducers for implantable hearing aids: the driving rod transducer (DRT), the floating mass transducer (FMT) or vibrant sound bridge, and the contactless transducer (CLT). Results of the experiments with the mechanical model were within the range of the results for human temporal bones. However, results with the mechanical model showed better reproducibility. The handling of the mechanical model was considerably simpler and less time-consuming. Systematic variations of mounting parameters showed that the angle of the rod has virtually no effect on the output of the DRT, the mass loading on the cable of the FMT has a larger impact on the output than does the tightness of crimping, and the output level of the CLT can be increased by 10 dB by optimizing the mounting parameters.

Key words: anatomical model, hearing aids, implantable devices, laser Doppler vibrometry, middle ear, mounting parameter, rehabilitation, stapes displacement measurement, temporal bone, transducer.


go to Contents Page for Volume 43, No 4
go to HTML version of this article
go to PDF version of this article