Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD)

Quick Links

  • Health Programs
  • Protect your health
  • Learn more: A-Z Health
Veterans Crisis Line Badge
 

Volume 47 Number 2, 2010
   Pages 157 — 168

Abstract — Construct validity of RT3 accelerometer: A comparison of level-ground and treadmill walking at self-selected speeds

Paul Hendrick, MPhty;* Thalia Boyd, BPhty; Oliver Low, BPhty; Kylie Takarangi, BPhty; Mike Paterson, BPhty; Leica Claydon, PhD; Steve Milosavljevic, PhD

Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract — This study examined differences in accelerometer output when subjects walked on level ground and on a treadmill. We asked 25 nondisabled participants to wear an RT3 triaxial accelerometer (StayHealthy, Inc; Monrovia, California) and walk at their "normal" and "brisk" walking speeds for 10 minutes. These activities were repeated on a treadmill using the individual speeds from level-ground walking on two occasions 1 week apart. Paired t-tests found a difference in RT3 accelerometer vector magnitude (VM) counts/min between the two walking speeds on both surfaces on days 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). Although we found no significant differences between VM counts/min on the two surfaces at normal and brisk speeds on days 1 and 2 (p > 0.05), we found wide limits of agreement between level ground and treadmill walking at both speeds. Measurement and discrimination of walking intensity employing RT3 accelerometer VM counts/min on the treadmill demonstrated reasonable validity and stability over two time points compared with level-ground walking.

Key words: accelerometer, agreement, exercise, free living, locomotor activities, physical activity, RT3 accelerometer, treadmill, walking, validity.


View HTML  ¦  View PDF  ¦  Contents Vol. 47, No. 2