Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD)

Quick Links

  • Health Programs
  • Protect your health
  • Learn more: A-Z Health
Veterans Crisis Line Badge

Volume 49 Number 2, 2012
   Pages 191 — 208

Abstract — Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: A systematic review

Niamh A. Moloney, MSc;1* Toby M. Hall, PhD;2 Catherine M. Doody, PhD1

??School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Population Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland; ??School of Physiotherapy, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

Abstract–The use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) has become more widespread, with increasing focus on describing somatosensory profiles and pain mechanisms. However, the reliability of thermal QST has yet to be established. We systematically searched the literature using key medical databases. Independent reviewers evaluated reliability data using the Quality Appraisal for Reliability Studies checklist. Of the 21 studies we included in this review, we deemed 5  to have high methodological quality. Narrative analysis revealed that estimates of reliability varied considerably, but overall, the reliability of cold and warm detection thresholds ranged from poor to excellent, while heat and cold pain thresholds ranged from fair to excellent. The methodological quality of research investigating the reliability of thermal QST warrants improvement, particularly in terms of appropriate blinding. The results from this review showed considerable variability in the reliability of each thermal QST parameter.

Key words: cold detection threshold, cold pain threshold, detection thresholds, heat pain threshold, neurophysiology, pain thresholds, Quality Appraisal for Reliability Studies, quantitative sensory testing, reliability, warm detection threshold.

View HTML  ¦  View PDF  ¦  Contents Vol. 49, No. 2
This article and any complementary material should be cited as follows:
Moloney NA, Hall TM, Doody CM. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: A systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(2):191–208.

Last Reviewed or Updated  Wednesday, April 4, 2012 12:30 PM

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional